The bar chart compares the amount of minutes of telephone calla on three different categories in UK. Figures are given from 1995 to 2002.
It is clear that British people used local-fixed line more than the other two call types in each year while mobiles was lowest at the same time. We can also see that the biggest change was seem in the number of time spent on mobiles.
In year 1995, the number of minutes of local calls almost doubled the figure for national/ international – fixed line at 70 billions and 35 billions respectively, while the number of time for mobiles stood at under 3 billions. The figure for local – fixed line peaked in 1999, at nearly 90 billions which is the highest figure shown on the chart, before falling back to around 70 billions at the end of the period.
Over a period of 17 years from 1995, the amount of both national/ international calls and mobiles remained high. The minutes of mobiles rate jumped to around 45 billions above the year 1995. While the rate of time for national and international calls saw a small increase, reaching a peak of 64 billions in 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
...an also see that the biggest change was seem in the number of time spent on mobiles....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58793969849 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40110577794 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557788944724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1462701469 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.444444444 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184008925855 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931410322355 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509407379434 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130080535578 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752908001817 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.