The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise th
The bar chart compares the number of billions minutes of phone calls by the period in the UK.
Overall, the fixed line in local went up and down whilst the fixed line national, international and the mobiles phone increased sharply from 1995 to 2002.
As you can see from the bar, the local-fixed line firstly in 1995 was over than 70 minutes ( in billions ). After that, it jumped slowly and stopped at the points of 90 billions minutes of calls in 1999. In next three years, the local-fixed line had a fall number to approximately to 70 billions minutes.
The mobiles was the lowest number of minutes ( in billions ) of telephone calls in 1995 with under a half of ten billions minutes. But it significantly upward until 50 billions minutes in 2002.
The national and international-fixed line had started with under 40 minutes ( in billions ). The number went up by the time. In 2002, there was at least 60 billions minutes of its.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...firstly in 1995 was over than 70 minutes in billions . After that, it jumped slow...
^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...95 was over than 70 minutes in billions . After that, it jumped slowly and stoppe...
^^
Line 4, column 13, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[5]
Message: You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
...ly to 70 billions minutes. The mobiles was the lowest number of minutes in billio...
^^^
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mobiles was the lowest number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in 1995 ...
^^
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he lowest number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in 1995 with under a ...
^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d line had started with under 40 minutes in billions . The number went up by the ...
^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...arted with under 40 minutes in billions . The number went up by the time. In 2002...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 762.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67484662577 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71298614953 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509202453988 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.722544388 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.2 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305673141865 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139851165832 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703226699483 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197087416652 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782001545426 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.66 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.