The line graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2000
The line graph compares data on 3 resources of air pollutants in the UK over the period 15 years.
Overall, it is clear that the figure for air pollution dropped between these years. The decline from air pollutants in industrial resources was particularly significant.
In 1990, the air pollutants in total reached at 7 million tonnes. But this amount was declined enormously by 3 million tonnes from 1990 to 1999. And the amount continuous fell down into nearly 3 million tonnes at the end of period.
Industry accounted over than 5 million tonnes in 1990. But the amount fell into 3 million tonnes in next 6 years and it went down to 2 million tonnes in 2005. The air pollution in transport provided a negligible amount around one million tonne while the amount of air pollution from households had a slight drop at that time.
- The diagrams show the cross sections of two tunnels one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese island 73
- The graph below shows US consumers'average annual expenditures on cell phone and residental phone services between 2000 and 2011. 56
- The table below shows the percentage of population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 56
- The chart shows the global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013. 78
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of frog.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 687.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73793103448 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63484380989 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572413793103 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 197.1 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.080550297 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3333333333 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231855390615 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116206202487 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835871417212 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172329264717 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592704647222 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.