The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart illustrated total number of minutes in billions of cell phone call in the United kingdom, there are three sector categories amid of 1995 - 2002.

Firstly, in 19th century there are not much technology development then continuous years passing through electronics item more expand in 20tb century. Look at bar graph in 1995 year there are three categories reached the bottom compared to other information. An additionally folks more aware about machinery instrument then end of the 19th century several call of local, international and mobiles reached the vertical sky. After fixed line communication diminish and wireless cell phone growth is rise in enter the 20th century. In among 2000-2002 there are inversely proportion of fixed line and wireless communication, but only national and international fixed line is dramatically soar in 1995-2002.

To conclude, communication in the United kingdom there are only two categories uplift in 1995-2002. Fixed line bar graph gradually increase and continuous decline end of the 20th century.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun call seems to be countable; consider using: 'several calls'.
Suggestion: several calls
...instrument then end of the 19th century several call of local, international and mobiles rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'soared'.
Suggestion: soared
...nternational fixed line is dramatically soar in 1995-2002. To conclude, communica...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48170731707 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93526107455 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126628379862 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576609612225 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781779720327 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117899765157 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094592476687 0.0819641961636 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.