The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie charts illustrated who more active during the bicycle to work or conduct the travel to car there are pie chart divided in 5 item.

Firstly , folks are more able to do hardwork because of exercise on cycling to work there are 30% to maintain our physical activity and less population other side less pursue reason for increase technology lead to more satisfied near the second quadrant. Secondly , ride your bicycles than lower sustained cost of only 12% additionally , faster than driving and no parking issue create appropriate value of are 13% and 15% , opposite view faster than cycling save the time and you can carry on lot of things to work there near the half quadrant . So 11% of safety than bicycle and easily to reached your own beyond work with the certain time limite.

To sum up , many human preferred to travel the car because they are more feature compared to cycle likely security , save time fasted way to go on reached your position.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'charts'?
Suggestion: charts
...conduct the travel to car there are pie chart divided in 5 item. Firstly , folks a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... pie chart divided in 5 item. Firstly , folks are more able to do hardwork beca...
^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xercise on cycling to work there are 30% to maintain our physical activity and le...
^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sfied near the second quadrant. Secondly , ride your bicycles than lower sustained...
^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... sustained cost of only 12% additionally , faster than driving and no parking issu...
^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arking issue create appropriate value of are 13% and 15% , opposite view faster t...
^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...te appropriate value of are 13% and 15% , opposite view faster than cycling save ...
^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ngs to work there near the half quadrant . So 11% of safety than bicycle and easil...
^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...th the certain time limite. To sum up , many human preferred to travel the car ...
^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun human seems to be countable; consider using: 'many humans'.
Suggestion: many humans
...the certain time limite. To sum up , many human preferred to travel the car because the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eature compared to cycle likely security , save time fasted way to go on reached y...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74404761905 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32715294219 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.708981042 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.4 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124164989762 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723275609698 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525178097676 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969918156396 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560435963575 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.