The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The first bar chart compares the proportion of 5 reasons why people choose bicycle to get to work and the second bar graph illustrates the reasons why people travel to work by car.

Overall, it can be seen that more than half of people travel to work by bicycle for health and less pollution issues while main reason for choosing a car to get to work is a comfort.

Total 60% of people go to work by cycling as it is beneficial for health and fitness. No parking problems influenced 15% of people to go to work by bicycle, following by them who choose cycling for reason no costs constitute 13%. 12% of people travel to work by cycle as it is faster that driving.

People who travel to work by car for comfort reason accounts for 40%, and approximately two times less people choose car for distance to work reason. Need to carry things to work and faster than cycling reasons comprise of 28%. The choice of 11% of employees answers that they prefer a car as it is safer than cycling.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bicycle'
Suggestion: to bicycle
...oportion of 5 reasons why people choose bicycle to get to work and the second bar graph...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cycle'.
Suggestion: to cycle
...y bicycle, following by them who choose cycling for reason no costs constitute 13%. 12%...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...to work and faster than cycling reasons comprise of 28%. The choice of 11% of employees ans...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efer a car as it is safer than cycling.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43715846995 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33083010297 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486338797814 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1246458909 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291765360415 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144060136728 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894306263641 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213962798611 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682781043015 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.