In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There are many folks and animals survive the earth but main causes of human being can make worse these planet. More struggle to live on the earth because of rise sea level, global warming and climate change other so on. As per my perspective human can control the pollution then maybe live on Earth is possible.

To commence with, people are 17-18 century more attractive on tree side and growing on plants then follow the year more development technology and along with increase population, so main reason behind is deforestation. In might be human can make better quality of life in the earth but they limited control the population and air, land and water pollution. Many people can plant trees and more rely on renewable resource and use recycling method. For instance, plastic is enormous spend on land and water, so industrial companies can recycle these products too lot of create problem easily solved. Vast countries lots of coin expand in defense system rather than spend on clear our world. In the forecast, human further do it activities continuous so difficult live on global.

On the other people opinion, more money show be spend on researching other planets to live, such as Mars, on the far away plant or alliance. There are already upcoming huge tsunami, cyclone, flood and environment change. For example Western of country is United States of America lot of folks die because of hurricane.

I pen down saying that, that own authorized can bound such thing like a plastic, fuel consume, waste of material extra. More people contribute coin on clean world and pollution environment so no one can find other planets.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this planet' or 'these planets'?
Suggestion: this planet; these planets
...in causes of human being can make worse these planet. More struggle to live on the earth bec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...warming and climate change other so on. As per my perspective human can control th...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95289855072 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45889063242 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641304347826 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3346248641 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256547856315 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861682704312 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970764411178 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162457501188 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622440722671 0.056905535591 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.