In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that more budget should be allocated to finding other planets to live since life on the earth is increasingly difficult. While I agree that living on the earth becomes more and more unsustainable, I disagree with the idea of pouring more money on researching other planets to sustain human life.
People nowadays encounter more challenges to live because of continuous climate change and polluted environment. First, climate change, as a consequence of global warming, triggers more extreme weather events namely floods, hurricanes and prolonged heatwaves, which might kill hundreds of people in some devastating cases. If the global warming continues at this current alarming rate, it could be predicted to be even more adverse. Second, the rising level of pollution is another concern, especially happened in big cities where there are high population densities. For example, there is a vast amount of toxic fumes polluting the environment emitted from thousands of vehicles or heavy industry plants around the city.
However, I would argue that searching for new habitable planets to sustain people should be given low priority, aiming to save resources for other solutions for the above environmental problems. It is apparent that because of the finiteness of human resources, the more people spend on space exploration with no guarantee of success, the less they expend on more urgent measures to improve current human life on the earth. Hence, Budget should be spent first on providing good health and education service. The second priority would be to invest in advanced technology as renewable energy generation, which is a practical method to significantly alleviate the global warming rate.
In conclusion, spending money on tackling environmental problems on the earth must have more priority than on space exploration for new habitats.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'living'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: living
...ople nowadays encounter more challenges to live because of continuous climate change an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40753424658 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80581880372 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609589041096 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1118900076 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.583333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362794180645 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130147989361 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115379418317 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226676347102 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149177720943 0.056905535591 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.