Many people go to university for academic study. More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is lack of qualified workers such as electrocians and plumbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that there is a shortage of qualified workers since people prefer going to universities rather than vocational schools. While I concede the importance role of universities, I agree with the idea that we should encourage more people to become qualified workers.
There is a ground supporting the view of scholastic pursuit at universities. The principle role of academic study is to provide students with a solid foundation of skills and knowledge related to a broad area of study. The depth and breadth of the knowledge which students take advantage of would promote their critical thinking and creative ability, in order to find specific solutions for certain complicated problems that they encounter in the working process. For example, being an economist bachelor, I usually apply general economic theories that I learned from my university in to specific discussion with my senior manager on monthly plan analysis.
However, I am convinced that vocational training should be recognized as a key to the workforce supply because it benefits both people and authorities. First, if students decide to follow technical education, they can increase their employability and likelihood of finding a job, especially in the current competitive working environment where there is a redundancy of bachelors and engineers. In contrast to general theories and principal from universities, vocational knowledge is designed to help people go directly into their new job, which also might increase their salaries in a shorter time. Second, more people become qualified workers could balance demand and supply of workforce, ultimately reducing burden on the government budget since it reduces unemployment rate, increase budget from tax income and decrease unemployment benefit.
In conclusion, more people should go to vocational school to fill the shortage of qualified workers in the current workforce.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51194539249 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98527723364 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58361774744 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1984416232 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.818181818 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261918438977 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101732812696 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870083275012 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185776591046 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862686798852 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.