As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree?
People have distinctive views about what kinds of obligation a company should have. While I accept that the top priority of companies is to generate profits, I agree that they should also be responsible for society.
On the one hand, businesses already contribute to society by only focusing on making money. First, by earning huge profits, companies could be able to expand their businesses, which creates more job opportunities for citizens. As a result, the unemployment rate would be reduced. For example, the mobile phone giant Samsung, which has experienced a significant increase in profits over the years, has created thousands of jobs for local people since it started investing in Vietnam in 1996. Additionally, companies usually pay more tax when earning higher profits. This money could be invested in a variety of vital sectors such as education and health care, which will benefit society as a whole.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why companies also need to have social responsibilities. The first one is that since a growing number of factories these days has resulted in serious environmental degradation such as global warming or air pollution stemming from factory emissions, businesses are required to take immediate actions to protect the natural environment. For instance, factories could spend money on installing waste treatment systems instead of discharging chemical wastes into rivers. Additionally, Companies should consider donating their money to charity or carrying out social activities by themselves. This not only helps unfortunate people but enhances images of the company. As an illustration, Vinamilk has been appreciated by providing annual scholarships for Vietnamese students being from impoverished families.
In conclusion, while making profits is a fundamental vision of businesses, they should profoundly reflect on their social responsibilities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6124567474 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08482893952 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8304862483 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.133333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1703996948 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575792588082 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656399740524 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109001647091 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307124142539 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.