It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects. What are the causes? And what will be the effects on society?
It is true that there is a lack of students who opt to study science subjects at universities and colleges. This problem happens because of some reasons, and it can have several adverse impacts on society.
There are several grounds why few students choose to pursue science as their major. First, as science subjects are often perceived as demanding in terms of both workload and intellectual content, many students are so reluctant to embark on biology, physics or chemistry. Instead, many of them decide to study business or finance which seem to be less challenging to follow. Second, in many countries, the salary level of people working in science areas might be generally less than that of those who are finance officers or bankers. As a result, science sectors become less attractive, which discourages students to follow them at university.
A shortage of learners in science fields can result in some negative effects. The first impact is that there will be an imbalance in the future workforce. To be more specific, while there would be a serious shortage of labour in science jobs, human resources in other sectors could become increasingly redundant. Consequently, this could raise the unemployment rate, and increase the burden on society. Additionally, a decrease in the workforce for science areas could restrain the national development in technology, which is believed to be a top priority of any nation these days. This less innovation will not guarantee the long term and sustainable development of a nation.
In conclusion, fewer students choose to study science subjects because of the aforementioned reasons, and this problem could lead to several adverse impacts on society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ht be generally less than that of those who are finance officers or bankers. As a resul...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, second, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23357664234 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85675750733 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543795620438 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6261516571 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210755853422 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748215330751 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412048560543 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126725162935 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391908867841 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.