In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and internet access. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is true that children in remote areas in many developing countries have a limited chance to pursue education. While some computers and internet access could be provided to help these children to some extent, I would argue that schools and teachers play more vital roles in the education of these children.
On the one hand, computers and the internet could be an effective tool for facilitating the way of learning in rural areas. First, since computers with an internet connection could give children a huge number of online learning courses. The online courses are designed so vividly that they can interact with tutors who are some distance away. As a result, children can find and learn subjects quite effectively without the need to go to school. Second, as there are no geographic barriers on the internet, people in rural areas could have the same opportunity as those in cities to search for unavailable materials in their areas.
On the other hand, I believe that it is better to provide more schools and teachers in rural areas. One reason is that by interacting directly with students, teachers can enlighten them and instill on them the value of leaning. Without teachers' support, students might struggle to understand completely new and unheard topics on computers. Second, the learning environment at school encourages children to interact and collaborate with other classmates of various backgrounds. This will sharpen soft skills such as teamwork and interpersonal skills which are really essential for their future. If students just learn at home with computers, they might not have the chance to meet their peers.
In conclusion, schools and teachers make a great contribution to widening access to education for children in rural communities, while computers and internet access are just a tool supporting children in learning.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, second, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21739130435 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73317617628 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7199134097 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.428571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260285197198 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879052242424 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728853137968 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168132052274 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583492635214 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.