In many countries, governments are spending a large amount of money on improving internet access. Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money?
In many parts of the world, huge proportions of national budgets are being poured into the amelioration of internet access. This trend happens because of some reasons, and I would argue that it is not the best way to use state money.
There are two principal reasons why the improvement of the internet is given top priority in many countries. First, more people would have the chance to have omnipresent access to the wealth of information available on the internet. As a result, inhabitants would be better informed and more highly educated. Second, an improved internet supply could facilitate the operation of organizations, promoting their development. For example, companies find it easier to manage their operation online such as approaching their customers, managing their employees, and carrying out transactions with international partners. In the long run, the growth of such companies makes a great contribution to the thriving of national economies.
I would argue that upgrading the internet is not the most reasonable measure to spend state money. One consideration is that the broadband connection in many countries is fast enough to satisfy the basic demand of the public. For instance, hardly do individuals in Vietnam have to wait a long time for a web page to load, and online business meetings even became popular years ago. The improvement of the internet, therefore, can be deemed not obligatory and urgent in many countries like Vietnam. Additionally, there are other fields that are being placed under strain and require capital disbursements to function. To illustrate, a number of state hospitals in Vietnam have been conducting research on a cure for cancer, and it seems that this should be the top investment priority.
In conclusion, there are two main explanations for governments' special attention to upgrading the internet, and I think it is not the most optional measure to allocate national budgets.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26129032258 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.982643165 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574193548387 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5190242376 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.733333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23003745224 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700412777596 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646945425615 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133236691729 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300932798525 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.