Some people say that what children watch influences their behavior. Other believe that the amount of time they spend on television influences their behavior most. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about whether the content of TV programs or the length of time spent on watching TV has a more impact on children. While children might be affected by what they watch, I would argue that the amount of time influence more on them.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why children could be affected by the content of TV programs. First, children who are still immature easily imitate undesirable behaviors, such as violence or drug abuse which sometimes depicted in movies, without being aware of any consequences. For example, children might fall under the impression that the use of alcoholic drinks is fashionable and end up consuming this substance. Second, as young viewers find it easy to be swayed by captivating advertisements for junk food or video games, they might pester their parents to buy these goods impulsively. This could cause selfish behaviors in children.
On the other hand, I believe that children’s behaviors are influenced most by the length of time they spend watching TV. One reason is that children who spend much time in front of screens could be reluctant to do outdoor exercise. This sedentary lifestyle is detrimental to their health, making them more prone to the risk of developing some type of diseases such as obesity or rickets. Additionally, excessively watching TV could lead to less time children spend on social activities. This would discourage children from having real interaction with people around them. As a result, children’s social skills could be impaired.
In conclusion, although the content of TV programs might be harmful to children, I strongly believe that the length of time has more impact on the way children behave.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13120567376 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82389982842 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8418429416 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.357142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268858243928 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103132497252 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100786327113 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168281670317 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080809275585 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.