it is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that government should only support their own citizens instead of taking care of people in other countries. While it is true that focusing on domestic people is given high priority, I would argue that it is also feasible to help others worldwide.
To begin with, there are some reasons while governments should focus first on people in their nations. First, people pay tax to form their governments’ budgets, which requires governments to allocate efficiently the money back so as to improve the living standard of their citizens. Second, due to the limited budgets, governments have to act for the sake of their inhabitants by investing money first in various vital sectors in their countries, such as public health service or education. If the government spend excessively on providing aids for other countries, they will not have enough resources to meet the increasing need of their citizens.
However, I believe that it is also possible to help residents from other parts of the world. The first reason is since rich countries often have overwhelming resources, compared to impoverished ones, only small donations or technical support from the former could tackle extremely serious problems in the later. For example, Western countries sent doctors and equipment to help African countries cope with the outbreak of the Ebola virus epidemic arising in 2014. If the western nations had not helped, the number of deaths from the disease would have increased enormously. The other reason is that since the act of supporting other people promote the sense of humanity, people in the nation supporting others might be really proud of their government.
In conclusion, while concentrating efforts on improving their citizens’ life is the primary role of governments, they should also spare a certain resource for assisting other from other nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... to allocate efficiently the money back so as to improve the living standard of their ci...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, really, second, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28762541806 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78172017587 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57525083612 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9084343382 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.75 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27016452163 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110459169255 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940494572226 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173349510714 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109032873387 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.