Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?
Some people think that protecting animals and birds is excessively attracting concern and resources of society. Personally, I would argue that although much attention and a large budget are given, the protection of wild species is worth being focused on at the current scale.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people are paying much attention and allocate many resources to protect the wildlife. First, many non-governmental organizations have been globally established, in which their visions are to guarantee the survival of wild animals and birds. This undoubtedly attracts a great deal of social attention via a variety of their programmes. For example, The WildAid Campaign whose aim is to protect endangered species has drawn incredible community’s attention by appointing the football star David Beckham as its lead ambassador. Second, being globally conducted, some protection programmes could cost a huge amount of money for building infrastructure or carring out researches. If they are not allocated budget, their aims are hardly achieved.
However, I believe that the current social concern and budget are really necessary because of the importance of the nature. The first reason is that protecting wild animals and birds would maintain the balance of ecosystem, which ensure the survival of various creatures on the earth, and human race is of no exception. If just only a few species became extinct, the ecosystem would be disturbed, threatening the existence of vast number of other species. Additionally, because natural habitats are really crucial for human, preserving the habitats to protect the wildlife significantly benefits human. For instance, rain forests produce oxygen, absorb CO2 and stabilize the earth climate.
In conclusion, while much concern and many resources are focused on the protection of wild animals and birds, they deserve to be protect because of because of their vital role in human’s life
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'because of'.
Suggestion: because of
...s and birds, they deserve to be protect because of because of their vital role in human's life ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, they deserve to be protect because of because of their vital role in human&apo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, really, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48184818482 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94456399909 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587458745875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6235474207 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238175672434 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796218374137 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739992594902 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166599256057 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719606109729 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.