More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why? Who benefits more from this, the community or these young people?
It is true that a growing number of youngsters from prosperous nations are willing to do voluntary work for a short time in underprivileged countries. There are several reasons for this trend, and I would argue that it equally benefits both these individuals and host communities.
To begin with, there are two main reasons why many young people decide to do unpaid work in poor nations. First, youngsters can accumulate enormous life experience and practical skills that they have not had the chance to gain at university. For example, their team-work skills would be significantly improved in the process of collaboration with other international volunteers. This precious experience would definitely help the youngsters to stand out amongst many candidates applying for a competitive job. Second, the voluntary efforts stem from the sense of global social responsibility, which encourages individuals to support others less fortunate than themselves without any demand for a reward.
I believe that both the host community and these young people benefit. Regarding the young, they benefit from the enormous real-life experience gained from oversea voluntary work. Without exaggeration, it is a life-changing challenge, and the youngster will return home with a much more mature and broader outlook on life. In terms of host nations, they can have an opportunity to raise the living standards of their inhabitants. To be more specific, the quality of public education could be improved, and many impoverished people will have the chance to own a house that they simply can not afford by themselves.
In conclusion, there are some clear reasons for this volunteering trend, and I concur with the idea that both the volunteers and host communities are the equal beneficiaries of the practice above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, regarding, second, so, for example, in conclusion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3661971831 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02815263671 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588028169014 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4744678582 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.230769231 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225771737597 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083989462957 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808475477399 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126420389599 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062297374402 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.