The given map illustrated rural of stokeford what change in past and present situation show which plot is destructed and buildout.
Firstly grow up in population in 1930 there are few shop available in 2010 rise in folks increase the number of mall. There are1930 human are very eco-friendly with animal but now a day this plot completed destructed and make out complex. Secondly, in 1930 plant is most popular in past but after 80 years ago up surge of population growth lead to build retirement home. There are some place is remain unchanged namely river Stoke, houses and bridge. In 1930 there only one primary school is there but after several years rocketed children of school then buildout other two building left and right side.
To conclude , soar in folks they less priority given on animal and green plant other side more convenient in business and constructive side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tokeford what change in past and present situation show which plot is destructed ...
^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...tirement home. There are some place is remain unchanged namely river Stoke, houses an...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ding left and right side. To conclude , soar in folks they less priority given ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 734.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92617449664 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42234046602 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691275167785 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.4723362606 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.857142857 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138931776756 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545086757839 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625547635326 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877792479828 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717826392301 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.