The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares how much various kinds of exports in one state could earn in both 2015 and 2016. The table describes the trends of how the proportion of single type of exports changed in 2016 compared to 2015.
It is noticeable that petroleum products created the highest revenue in both two years, while textiles stayed at a low rate. The table illustrates that the only category with decreased earnings was gems and jewellery, and at the same time textiles showed the highest increase.
Petroleum products earned more than $60 billion per year from 2015 to 2016, and engineered goods earned nearly as much in 2016. Textiles had the lowest income with around 28 billion in 2015, but this situation improved in 2016, the year textiles reached a similar revenue level to agricultural products.
As we could see from the table, textiles had a great increase of 15.24% in 2016, nearly double the percentage of the second-fastest-increasing category, engineered goods, with an 8.5% rise. Gems and jewellery were the only kind which earned less and decreased by 5.18% in 2016.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83934902263 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60773480663 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2142665131 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.125 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283862436481 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127265339248 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927468859177 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164757608825 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10657309696 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.