The bar chart and accompanying table offer a comprehensive insight into the export dynamics of a specific nation across diverse categories during the years 2015 and 2016, as well as the corresponding percentage changes within these categories.
Evidently, Engineered goods emerged as the pivotal export category during this period, surpassing all others in both years. Petroleum products, the runner-up, remained a formidable contributor to the nation's export earnings. Conversely, Gems and Jewelry faced a noteworthy decline, indicating shifts in the country's export trends.
To delve into the specifics, Petroleum products, which commanded the highest export value of approximately $60 billion in 2015, witnessed a marginal 3% increase by 2016. The most dramatic surge, however, occurred in the export of Engineered goods, surmounting the $58 billion mark in 2015 and surging to almost $63 billion in 2016. Agricultural products, commencing at around $31 billion in 2015, demonstrated a steady but moderate growth of 0.81% in export value, a testament to the nation's consistent agricultural prowess. In contrast, Textiles, initially a minor player with export earnings of $27 billion, underwent a staggering transformation, marking a remarkable 15.24% growth in its export value, underscoring its newfound prominence. Conversely, Gems and Jewelry, which initially contributed over $40 billion, encountered a 5.18% downturn in its export value, reflecting a substantial decline and altering the composition of the nation's total exports by the close of 2016.
In summation, the analyzed period witnessed a multifaceted evolution in the nation's export landscape, with Engineered goods and Petroleum products leading the charge. The various percentage changes underscore the dynamic nature of global trade, with some categories ascending while others experienced significant fluctuations, ultimately shaping the trajectory of the nation's export economy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 965.302439024 173% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91134751773 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19471271423 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 106.607317073 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585106382979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 283.868780488 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.868012489 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.545454545 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345096427615 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129927363345 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652380536132 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209378248239 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543865759216 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 61.2550243902 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.4140731707 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.06136585366 133% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 40.7170731707 258% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.