The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following chart illustrates the amount of export earnings of a specific country in billion dollars during 2015 and 2016 regarding different categories, with the table depicting a comparison amongst product categories in terms of percentage change in values at the same period.
As can be clearly observed from the chart and the table, export earnings of the country can be divided into two distinctive groups based on increase or decrease in product categories values. The first group consists of Gem and jewelry. It was a dramatic decline in export value of it by about 5.18%. The country earned more than 42 billion dollars by exporting Gem and jewelry in 2015 while it was far fewer in 2016 around less than 40 billion dollars.
However, Petroleum products, engineered goods, Agricultural products, and Textile are placed in the second group. All categories of this group experienced somehow rise whether gradual or sharp. Petroleum products increased drastically from under 60 billion dollars in 2015 to above 63 billion dollars in 2016 which it was a 3% increase. Unlike Agricultural products which witnessed a slight climb of 0.81% in 2016 compared with 2015, around 30 billion dollars in both years, there was a sharp rise in Textile exports from nearly 25 billion dollars in 2015 to more than 30 billion dollars in 2016. The change percentage of Textile is 15.24%. Meanwhile, the country gained more than 60 billion dollars through exporting engineered goods in 2016, which it showed a significant rise of 8.3% in comparison with virtually 55 billion dollars of 2015.
It is clear from the chart and table that the county benefited from exports of petroleum and engineered products during 2015 and 2016 far more than other categories, whereas Textile observed the most rise regarding percentage by 15.24%, followed by engineered goods and petroleum products by 8.5% and 3%, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...xport earnings of a specific country in billion dollars during 2015 and 2016 regarding ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 965.302439024 165% => OK
No of words: 309.0 196.424390244 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16504854369 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69664551371 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485436893204 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 283.868780488 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.110541682 43.030603864 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292697556859 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114049282434 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083894641578 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211202038889 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066553794854 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.