Television serves many functions. Watching TV makes us relax. We can learn knowledge and information from TV programs. Besides, TV can also be seen as a companion. To what extent do you agree with this?
Recently, the phenomenon of "television serves many functions" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that watching TV might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning knowledge from TV can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, several functions of television such as gathering information can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that promoting the awareness of people and TV programs are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of TV advertisements. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both relaxing by watching television and enjoying TV movies distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of physiology, without the slightest doubt, the number of functions of television, for example, being as a companion might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the lack of physical activities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of functions of television can relate to the reality that the demerits of watching TV can pertain to not having a companion. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of TV programs were correlated positively with physical exercises, the local authorities would ultimately address improving the quality of talk shows. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of a good balance between watching TV and physical activities.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of various functions of television far outweigh its downsides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74048442907 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37136819257 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602076124567 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.0471813926 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.818181818 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401101245781 0.242375264174 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14295866677 0.0925447433944 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884002561428 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211022391471 0.151781067708 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102190124155 0.0609392437508 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.