Students can obtain information of academic subject from online, the printed books and articles, and discussion with their teachers and their peers. Which one is the most reliable source?
Recently, the phenomenon of "students can obtain information of academic subjects from online, the printed books, articles, and discussion with their teachers and their peers" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that online resources might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the printed papers can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, obtaining information of academic subjects from the printed books and articles can provide the society with profound effects which might stem from the fact that academic journals and reliable sources are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the reliability of journals. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both articles and using as a reference source distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, getting information about academic subjects from online resources or discussion with the teachers and the peers might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of plagiarism. Moreover, fundamental aspects of online sources can relate to the reality that the demerits of the confidence of discussion can pertain to teachers' abilities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of online books were correlated positively with the evaluation of sources, the local authorities would ultimately address plagiarism issues. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of students' responsibilities.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt vigorously to support the idea that the merits of obtaining information of academic subjects from the printed books and articles far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-29 | Behnaz fallah | 85 | view |
| 2020-07-04 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-22 | Gohar Khan | 70 | view |
- The graph bellow shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Certain type of music affects young children s learning Researchers have researched on it Some people agree and some disagree What is your opinion 85
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
- Exams are commonly used in most schools and universities Some people think exams should be replaced by other forms of assessment Do you agree or disagree 74
- Space travel is fantastic these days but there are many issues such as environmental problems that we should be focusing on What are your views on the allocation of public funding 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89666666667 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2304987575 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 379.143842365 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.3374799281 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.818181818 104.977214359 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.530540438022 0.242375264174 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159348795741 0.0925447433944 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122778675617 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281747732662 0.151781067708 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056816993616 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 12.6369458128 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.