The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following chart illustrates how many Japanese tourists travelled foreign countries during the decade of 1985 to 1995, with a linear chart depicting what percentage of Japanese tourists made a visit of Australia at the same period.
As can be clearly observed from the first chart, around 5 million Japanese people experienced travelling abroad in 1985. There was a gradual climb until 1990 and it reached nearly 11 million. Unlike the fact that Japanese tourists who travelled abroad declined significantly to about 10 million in 1991, after that, it increased remarkably and touched 15 million in 1995.
Turning to the second chart as Australia’s share, it initiated from 2% in 1985 and went up significantly to approximately 5% till 1988. Although the Australia’s share declined in 1989 (to around 4%), from 1990 onward, it skyrocketed to more than 6% in 1993. Meanwhile, a slight decrease to roughly 6% was observable in 1994.
Overall, it is clear from the charts that, the trend of both was upward during the decade, albeit there was a fall in 1991 in the first chart. Likewise, two declines of 1989 and 1994 could be identified in the second chart. Apparently, there was a strong relationship between the number of Japanese tourists and the Australia’s market share in that decade.
- Poor lifestyles have a negative impact on people s health List some unhealthy lifestyles and discuss what government services could help 77
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- University tuition fees are increasing Some argue that higher education should be made free To what extend do you agree 77
- Effective learning requires time comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment Study and employment distract one from another To what extent do you think the statements are realistic Support your opinion with examples 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, if, likewise, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07943925234 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85851858186 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593457943925 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7586915329 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.7 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306949793329 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11700807451 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108972951802 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188355590921 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668404602034 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.