Young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities. What are the reasons? Do advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages.
Recently, the phenomenon of "young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that rural areas might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that living in the cities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, leaving homes and living in the cities can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that entering a university and finding a position are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of working in the cities. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both more income and increasing the life quality distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, leaving homes from rural areas might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the self-esteem of young people. Moreover, fundamental aspects of leaving rural areas can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of facilities can pertain to the absence of federal budgets. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of studying in small towns were correlated positively with job opportunities, the local authorities would ultimately address the mental issues of youths. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of a proper balance between rural and urban areas.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the idea that the merits of leaving homes to study and work in the cities far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-02 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2020-07-06 | Gohar Khan | 70 | view |
| 2020-04-04 | Gohar Khan | 72 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 67
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 to 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Does the advent of Internet change the role of teacher To what extent do you agree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42666666667 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.062214159 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603333333333 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.085858326 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345961277197 0.242375264174 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113489118877 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104562107627 0.071462118173 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198108706757 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075947288916 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.