Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed by government and individuals?
Recently, the phenomenon of "xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that xenophobia treatments by individuals might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the role of governments in xenophobia treatments can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the medical standpoint, finding solutions for xenophobia in the western countries can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that human fears and visiting unknown areas are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the definition of xenophobia. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both medical treatments and expanding friend networks distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, the lack of governments' attention to xenophobia might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of mental disorders. Moreover, fundamental aspects of fearing others can relate to the reality that the demerits of low self-esteem can pertain to people's confidence. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of governments' deficiency were correlated positively with the individuals' hardworking, the local authorities would ultimately address mental issues of the society. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of increasing life quality.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt vigorously to support the idea that the merits of finding solutions for xenophobia in the western countries by governments far outweigh its downsides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...erits of low self-esteem can pertain to peoples confidence. As a tangible example, some...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98936170213 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39467660967 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63475177305 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.5494006223 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.545454545 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31138155169 0.242375264174 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963823874869 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571034936081 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172662873756 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554024955204 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 12.6369458128 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.76 11.5310837438 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.