What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation? What will cause us to achieve it?
Recently, the phenomenon of "the advantages of cheaper public transportation" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that public transportation might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the cheaper public transportation can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the climate standpoint, cheaper public transportation can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that producing less greenhouse gases and using buses are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the benefits of using trains for transportation. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both preventing global warming and climate change distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, the lack of cheaper public transportation might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of spending more money on buying cars. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the public transportation can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of special bus lines can pertain to the absence of the governmental funds. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of spreading the public transportation were correlated positively with using bicycles, the local authorities would ultimately address improving the infrastructures. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of new transportation vehicles.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously to support the idea that the merits of cheaper public transportation far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-17 | vahidmetall | 77 | view |
| 2021-05-03 | vahidmetall | 85 | view |
| 2020-08-12 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Alireza.r.68 | 74 | view |
- Teenagers should receive lessons on principles of personal finance such as investing and debt To what extent do you agree with this statement 93
- Television serves many functions Watching TV makes us relax We can learn knowledge and information from TV programs Besides TV can also be seen as a companion To what extent do you agree with this 77
- the table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after in was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same tow periods Summari 73
- It is important for children to take extra classes or play after school Discuss both and give your opinions 88
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which my be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96071428571 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52901782891 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0427864095 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.727272727 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217607507711 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821346665467 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549104180894 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130401924644 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556501811844 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.