Some people think human behaviors can be limited by laws, others think laws have little effect. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of "some people think human behaviors can be limited by laws, others think laws have little effect" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that laws might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effect of laws can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the culture standpoint, the limitation of human behaviors by laws can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that cultural backgrounds and obeying the rules are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of traditional laws on human behaviors in societies. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both legislation centers and new policies in laws distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, the little effect of laws on human behaviors might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of criminal actions. Moreover, fundamental aspects of rules can relate to the reality that the demerits of bad laws can pertain to the lack of human knowledge. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of psychological aspects of regulations were correlated positively with human nature, the local authorities would ultimately address the elimination of prisons. Hence it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the reduction of crime rates.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the limitation of human behaviors by laws far outweigh its downsides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ely address the elimination of prisons. Hence it is reasonable to infer the preconcei...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57534246575 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16924254829 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599315068493 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9923471773 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465690365136 0.242375264174 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153359230188 0.0925447433944 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113156973939 0.071462118173 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251332225825 0.151781067708 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113890979274 0.0609392437508 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.