Because university degrees can get jobs with higher salaries, university students should pay full cost for their education. Do you agree or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of "because university degrees can get jobs with higher salaries, university students should pay the full cost for their education" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that university degrees might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the full cost for education can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, paying full cost for education by students can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that more income and paying debts are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the amount of the student's loans. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both the ability of students to pay their loans and the tuition of universities distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of the job market, without the slightest doubt, getting jobs with higher salaries because of university degrees might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of job opportunities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of getting jobs can relate to the reality that the demerits of higher degrees can pertain to higher salaries. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of unemployment rates were correlated positively with recruiting policies, the local authorities would ultimately address increasing the funds of universities. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the increasing cost of education.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of paying full cost for education by students far outweigh its downsides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68456375839 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20982933646 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590604026846 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.717083655 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.0 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.560431368426 0.242375264174 231% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186557802244 0.0925447433944 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132120100625 0.071462118173 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303279198157 0.151781067708 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103621881768 0.0609392437508 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.