With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give your own point of view.
Recently, the phenomenon of "with the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute, whereas many people are debating the proposition that online media might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that digital media can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the climate standpoint, procuring digital materials rather than constantly textbooks by universities can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that reducing the use of paper and preserving trees are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of online libraries. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both digital materials and using ebooks distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of education science, without the slightest doubt, the increase of digital media available online might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the lack of teenagers' knowledge. Moreover, fundamental aspects of traditional libraries can reality to the reality that the demerits of using textbooks can pertain to formal education. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the plagiarism in online materials were correlated positively with appropriate detection methods, the local authorities would ultimately address preparing online materials. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion on the distant learning concept.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the increase of digital media available online and procuring digital materials rather than textbooks far outweigh its downsides.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-04-30 | vahidmetall | 88 | view |
2020-12-25 | sajeevan | 77 | view |
2020-07-23 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
- In globalization it is impossible to succeed if you cannot speak a foreign language Do you agree or disagree 62
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Nowadays people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life Discuss 88
- Experience is more effective and useful than books and formal education To what extent do you agree with this opinion 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute, whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87837837838 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16025583564 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 379.143842365 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.0314531807 50.4703680194 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.0 104.977214359 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 20.9669160288 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413009304098 0.242375264174 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132761085078 0.0925447433944 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089786171642 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240489905003 0.151781067708 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513573548251 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 12.6369458128 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.66 53.1260098522 31% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.9458128079 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.42 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.26 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.94827586207 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.