The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 to 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following graph illustrates the mean share of each person in the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal contributed to greenhouse gas emissions during 1967 till 2007.
As can be clearly observed from the graph, there are two distinctive trends: downward and upward. Italy experienced s significant climb in CO2 emissions from nearly above 4 tons to about 8 tons within 1967 to 2007. Likewise, there was a sharp increase in greenhouse gas emissions in Portugal from around 1 ton per person to below 6 tons at the same course.
On the other hand, the downward trend consists of both UK and Sweden. Emission of CO2 went down considerably in UK from approximately 11 tons to a bit above 8 tons, while the greenhouse gas emissions of the Sweden witnessed a remarkably fall from nearly 9 tons per individual to below 6 ton during 1967 to 2007.
It is clear from the graph unlike other three nations of UK, Italy and Portugal which CO2 emissions followed a monotone increase or decrease, the amount of greenhouse gas emission in Sweden rose sharply during a decade from 1967 to 1977 then it fell wildly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('remarkably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
...e gas emissions of the Sweden witnessed a remarkably fall from nearly 9 tons per individual to be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75392670157 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69492668956 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560209424084 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8362222736 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.714285714 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213098164971 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111472291821 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530394436383 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153917457528 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171612102528 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.