When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of conflicts between tradition and technology and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, whereas some people believe that traditional skills will be eventually extinct by the advent of technology, others are of the opinion that officials should attempt to keep traditional ways of life alongside technology alive. In my mind, humans are capable of preventing traditional skills’ extinction due to technological developments.
Obviously, conventional skills and crafts have the ability to maintain their importance accompanying with technology. Japan could be taken into account as a tangible example. Japan, as one of the most sophisticated nations in terms of technology, succeeded to combine technology with tradition. Populace of Japan come up with innovative approaches to prevent mass extinction of their traditions, albeit nations around the four corners of the globe consider Japan as a symbol of modernization.
What’s more, technological feats stem from creative ideas, but apparently simple, of traditional skills and craftsmen. Hence, it is more likely that mankind couldn’t reach such cutting-edge technologies without utilizing conventional skills as well as masterpieces of our ancestors. Thus, traditional skills pave the way to colossal improvements regarding technology and so we shouldn’t lose sight of values of keeping our traditions alive.
On the other hand, loads of individuals elucidate that tradition belongs to the past rather that the present, or even future. Humans should leave such skills as making artefacts by clay or carpet-producing skills to museums. In their view, technologies will be far more than enough to meet humans’ needs.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that struggling to keep our traditional skills as well as out conventional ways of life alive is inextricably bound up with our fate. By the way, like Shakespeare’s, tradition or technology, that’s the question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-28 | InamAli | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | Guiseppe59192 | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-28 | sattar_iust | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | maryyrle | 67 | view |
| 2021-02-03 | Amnusheenh | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Being a journalist is one of the most difficult jobs in the world To what extent you agree with it 88
- A university education is necessary to succeed in a career to what extent to you agree or disagree 88
- The first chart bellow shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 67
- Some people say music promotes children learning However there are mixed results on impact of music generated from researches To what extent do you agree or disagree that music has impacts on humans life 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, whereas some p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ruggling to keep our traditional skills as well as out conventional ways of life alive is ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, if, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, as well as, by the way, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7003257329 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30240794055 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618892508143 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2000868055 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260873127242 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836711895286 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573242521924 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142331834631 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655705423097 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.