When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Technologies has grown overwhelmingly in the past few decades. Many people believe that old fashioned way of doing things has lost due to its emergence and it is impossible to save them. This essay will argue that why certain things will persist in existence, despite technological advancements.
To begin with, it is undeniable that the world modernized with the technical inventions which caused the extinction of traditional ways of life. The reliance on computers and machines increased because it guarantees ease, convenience and efficiency. For instance, in the past, people used to communicate overseas through letters which were taking months to reach to the intended person, but now a days, it is barely one click away to talk for hours. Similarly, in different corporate sectors, the menial jobs are carried out by Robots, instead of human. To exemplify, the BMW automotive company workforce is consist of one-third of the automated computers. The benefits which the technology brought to the society has eradicated the dependence on human.
However, despite all of the innovations in the IT sector, some of the skills has never lost its significance. The machines will never compete with human in their abilities and the human labor can only guarantee the quality of the product. For example, there is still a high demand for watches or fabrics which are handmade, instead of machines, due to its good quality. In addition, the technology has made everything easily accessible, still people do not let go of the old ways of doing it. For example, the internet is full of books and news, but people never stop investing on buying printed materials. Similar is the case with shopping. Although online shopping has brought everything to the doorstep, still going to the shopping malls for buying stuff is common. So, the point is, technologies cannot completely replace everything.
This essay argued that people who believe that conservative ways of life die out after technological breakthrough has the flawed understanding. In my opinion, I agree that technologies has changed the world massively by taking over different traditions and skills, but few of these where the quality and addiction is concerned, they would never be replaced whatsoever.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...hs to reach to the intended person, but now a days, it is barely one click away to talk fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...o reach to the intended person, but now a days, it is barely one click away to talk fo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
...the BMW automotive company workforce is consist of one-third of the automated computers...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...pendence on human. However, despite all of the innovations in the IT sector, some of t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...ever, despite all of the innovations in the IT sector, some of the skills has never lo...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ll of the innovations in the IT sector, some of the skills has never lost its significance....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, still, third, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25619834711 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91089298471 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581267217631 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9932061515 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.421052632 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202258472844 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554123188451 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540300192706 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123966846145 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392100135158 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.