Creative artist should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The appreciation for artwork has overwhelmingly increased in the past few decades. It is commonly allege by many that there should be no impositions on the artists from the government side in sharing their knowledge to the world in whatever form they like, be it pictures, music or films. This essay will argue that arts should be shared under the proper rules and regulations, despite its significance.
To begin with, artwork is undeniably the most effective way of communicating ideas on a global scale. For decades, it has been used for spreading peace, unity, and conveyance of cultural and history. To exemplify, Pakistan came into being due to two nation theory which was first proposed by Alama Iqbal in his poetry. Moreover, it can create awareness, and without them, we will be living in the dark. It is due to these movies, paintings and melodies, our knowledge goes far beyond our limitations into the Stone Age times. Therefore, underestimating its impacts on our lives would be preposterous.
However, it would be wrong, if we allow the artists to do anything. Arts has the power to lead people towards both negative and positive sides. If it is practiced negatively, then it can cause chaos in the world. For instance, certain times in the past, the dispute among nations has happened just because of corrupting the mind of people through arts. Furthermore, there are certain unethical illustrations, which is increasingly exacerbating the situation. Some artists attack the religion or culture of other people, which can cause collateral damage among human society. Hence, its continuous monitoring is indispensable for hindering deterioration of societies globally.
This essay argued that people who believe that there should be no law for artists expressing their taught has a flawed understanding. In my opinion, some artists spread the misconception and their activities should be restrained at any cost by the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'alleged'.
Suggestion: alleged
...in the past few decades. It is commonly allege by many that there should be no imposit...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25239616613 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99430742595 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629392971246 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2408471077 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224439366346 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598324314328 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752584618956 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145202553616 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835456807581 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.