Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of learning foreign languages and its corresponding impacts have sparked a massive dispute. Apart from various reasons to learn other nations’ languages, a remarkable number of individuals are of the belief that finding a job in other countries or making a trip to new foreign places are the most significant factors. In my view, learning foreign languages must have more important motives, say, literature and information exchange.
Obviously, nations have their own specific cultures and so literatures, based on those cultures, vary around all the globe. Thus, for being familiar with many distinctive sources of literatures among different countries, we should learn their languages. Likewise, to spread literature masterpieces of other nations like novels, historical poems, and essays throughout our country universities develop several disciplines particularly on translations. Therefore, educating high-quality translators is another considerable factor to learn other languages.
Moreover, scientists around the four corners of the planet, convey remarkable number of studies and make various discoveries almost every day, however these findings and discoveries are published such languages as English, French, and Germany. By learning these foreign languages, researchers find the ability to exchange their information with each other. Consequently, learning foreign languages paves the way to move the science borders a bit further.
On the other hand, we shouldn’t lose sight of naysayers’ views. They claim that traveling to and finding a job in other countries are the only incentives to learn their languages. Notwithstanding the fact that this group highlight the economic related aspects of learning other languages, traveling may include wide range of aims from spending time for pleasure in foreign countries to studying in a foreign university.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on both sides, I am inclined to believe that the purposes of learning a foreign language are far beyond finding a job or traveling to other countries. Meanwhile, what is the aim of some prodigies who have the ability to speak and write more than 10 languages?
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, apart from, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69604863222 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06029672782 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61094224924 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3331726905 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.933333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37295718708 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121186634628 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739695018311 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202873081319 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747882281233 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.