The chart below shows the value of one's country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The charts compare the amount of revenue and the change rate of export of the country in five different sectors between 2015 and 2016.
Overall, the main source of export revenue was petroleum products in the years of 2015 and 2016, while textiles experienced the highest increase in export. Only decreased gems and jewelry throughout the whole period.
In 2015, petroleum products were the chief source of income, at nearly 61 billion before increasing to about 63 billion in 2016. In the first year, Engineered goods and textiles were at roughly 56 billion and around 36 billion in turn. But they rose by 6 billion each the following year. Only sector of gems and jewellery saw decrease, from nearly 43 billion to 41 billion. There was little increase in agriculture products, from 31 billion to 31.5 billion.
When it comes to revenue rate of export, textiles had 15.24% compared to engineered products with 8.5%. The third sector with the higher export rate was petroleum. Nevertheless, gems and jewellery declined by 5.18%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roleum. Nevertheless, gems and jewellery declined by 5.18%.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, so, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04678362573 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49912265307 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2033297881 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4545454545 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5454545455 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18422858922 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767790444655 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961353176025 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159016325009 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983953922881 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.