The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
The pie chart illustrates types of work that Anthropology graduates from a unique university chose to do after finishing their study, while the table reflects the income gained from each type of employment for Anthropology graduates who have at least 5-year working experience.
Overall, the percentage of Anthropology graduates who chose to work full-time accounted for more than a half of the total work types. Besides that, most of Anthropology employees working as experienced freelance consultants or government sector got salaries over $75,000.
As shown in the pie chart, up to 52% of Anthropology students decide to choose full-time work, which is the highest figure in the chart. In contrast, the proportion of Anthropology graduates who want to do part-time work and achieve postgrad study at the same time is the lowest and makes up only 5% of the total work types. The percentage of students having the desire to pursue full-time postgraduate study is 8%, similar to that of not known work types. Part-time work attracts 15% of graduates, which is 3% higher than the figure for unemployed graduates.
After 5 years’ working, 80% of anthropologists working as freelancer consultants earn more than $75,000 in salaries, of which half of them achieve more than $100,000 of income, while in total there are only 20% of them receive wages under $75,000. The same scenario happens with anthropologists working in the government sector, and the only difference is that 50% of them receive salaries over $100,000. Private companies, however, offer the lowest salaries range for anthropology graduates compared to the other two employments, in which only 55% of employees earn an income over $75,000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, while, at least, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 273.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24542124542 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93064559435 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 283.868780488 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.2980879192 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.2 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223403089661 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934961280774 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743303374138 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157095941715 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854140167962 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.