The pie graph shows types of jobs that Anthropology major works after graduation in one university while the table graph illustrates incomes of Anthropology graduates in five years of work.
Overall, in pie graph, majority of Anthropology graduates have a full-time work while a small percentage of them have a part-time job and postgrad study. In table graph, the salaries of Anthropology increase after 5 years of working but varies in type of employment with Government Sector has the highest increase while Private companies has the lowest.
In pie graph, The number of Anthropology graduates have full-time job was around 52 percent with 12 and 15 percent of the graduates are unemployed and have a part-time work respectively. Full-time postgrad study and Not known both have the similar figures of 8 percent. And, only 5 percent of Anthropology graduates have part-time work with postgrad-study.
In table graph, 5 percent of Anthrology graduates have salaries of 25000 from Freelance consultants and Government Sector while Private companies have around 10 percent. With the base salaries of 50000 Freelance consultants and Government Sector has around 15 percent respectively, and Private companies have 35 percent. This number decrease in salary bracket of 75000 with 25 percent while the figures in Freelance consultants and Government Sector increase from 15 percent to 30 percent. With 100000 above, Freelance consultants have 40 percent, Government Sector have 50 percent, and Private companies have 30 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...companies has the lowest. In pie graph, The number of Anthropology graduates hav...
^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...f Anthropology graduates have full-time job was around 52 percent with 12 and 15 pe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45991561181 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00629284159 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417721518987 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7896893517 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.4 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159270673939 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091162281784 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105170630705 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159990811178 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129477967739 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.