The chart given below shows the expenditure involving in publishing a magazine. Summarize the information. Write at least 150 words.
The pie chart below gives information about the expenditure involving in publishing a magazine. Divided six categories such as editorial content development, promotion cost, binding cost, paper cost, transportation and printing cost. Overall, it can be seen that the greatest was in the percentage of expenditure incurred in editorial content development.
However, with expectation of reading, some of expend categories are amaze to describe. Editorial content development shows 30 percent from all percentage and is the highest considerable cost. Printing a magazine just expending 24 percent and being the second most expenditure cost while promotion cost consumes only 18 percent. Other consumptions are binding and paper less under 20 percent spending cost. In this case, paper is surprisingly show lower than binding cost. Initially, first assumption to the printing cost which need more paper but binding process are more use up the demand. The smallest cost in this information is 6 percent from all data financed for transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart below gives information about the expen...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...g in publishing a magazine. Divided six category such us editorial content development, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
...ther consumptions are binding and paper more less under 20 percent spending cost. In this...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'lower' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: lower
...n this case, Paper is surprisingly show more lower than binding cost. Initially, first ass...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5974025974 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03840598772 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662337662338 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0782059132 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.2 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120712914577 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636767973182 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875563361401 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102711383924 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218830237544 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.