The chart shows the amount of waste production by households in the UK from 1990 with projections until 2030.

Essay topics:

The chart shows the amount of waste production by households in the UK from 1990 with projections until 2030.

The line graph illustrates the number of waste produced by households in the Britain from 1990 with projections until 2030. Units are measured in kilograms.

Overall, the number of waste produced of British households was on plastics, glasses, metals, batteries, and organic, while paper remains stable. These figures are predicted to move up gradually, except that glasses and papers relatively unchanged.

It is noticeable that plastic waste had the highest production which started roughly 45kg in 1990 as compared to organic and glasses with fluctuations .Around 2017,organic went up about 40kg,whereas glasses stayed at 32.The amount has been foreseen to rise significantly on plastics of about 68kg in 2030,however,glasses will outraced the organic with an approximation to 50kg and 40 respectively.

Although metals had just above 10 kg in 1990 as opposed to batteries to around 13kg with modest fluctuations on years, and being envisaged that batteries will slightly overlap metals in 2030 to more than and less than 20kg respectively. Paper steady stayed at the bottom of about 12kg waste produced.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-08 an-an 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te produced by households in the Britain from 1990 with projections until 2030. U...
^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of waste produced of British households was on plastics, glasses, metals, batter...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 45kg in 1990 as compared to organic and glasses with fluctuations .Around 2017,o...
^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...o organic and glasses with fluctuations .Around 2017,organic went up about 40kg,w...
^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Around
...organic and glasses with fluctuations .Around 2017,organic went up about 40kg,whereas...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...about 40kg,whereas glasses stayed at 32.The amount has been foreseen to rise signif...
^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , glasses
...n plastics of about 68kg in 2030,however,glasses will outraced the organic with an appro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'outrace'
Suggestion: outrace
...about 68kg in 2030,however,glasses will outraced the organic with an approximation to 50...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... modest fluctuations on years, and being envisaged that batteries will slightly ...
^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars, and being envisaged that batteries will slightly overlap metals in 2030 to ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49418604651 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09352046187 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656976744186 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 115.471526661 43.030603864 268% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.0 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26549908871 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109532275362 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1364090033 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165564699685 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12341541526 0.0819641961636 151% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.