The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 big cities in 2000

Essay topics:

The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 big cities in 2000.

The bar chart illustrates the average daily highest and lowest levels of sulfur dioxide and dinitrogen oxide in air of four cities in 2000, measured in microgram per m3.

Overall, while some cities showed diversity range in levels of air pollutants, other just had minor difference between the minimum and maximum levels.

Los Angeles was the least city polluted by sulfur dioxide which ranged from 2 to 10 microgram per m3. There was also a slight difference between sulfur dioxide’s levels in Calcutta, which was 47 and 59 micrograms respectively. By contrast, with 120 micrograms difference, Mexico had the widest range in levels of sulfur dioxide, this city was also the most polluted at 200 micrograms in maximum level.

The figure for minimum dinitrogen oxide in Beijing was the lowest in that level, which was just 4 micrograms per m3, a little lower than half of Calcutta, although its maximum level was 54 micrograms, just slightly higher than 52 micrograms of Calcutta. Furthermore, Mexico City had the highest level of dinitrogen oxide at 207 micrograms per m3, nearly doubled in value of Los Angeles.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (9 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'microgram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'micrograms'.
Suggestion: micrograms
...ulfur dioxide which ranged from 2 to 10 microgram per m3. There was also a slight differe...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13586956522 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74093604222 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548913043478 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0894801976 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274228964742 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142473514176 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919872637191 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197875023539 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794400355159 0.0819641961636 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.