The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.
The bar graph explains the gross domestic product generated by IT industry and service industry in the UK during time period of 1992 to 2000.
Overall, it is readily apparent that, both components increased as a percentage of GDP, but IT industry remained at higher place throughout the given time.
To begin with, in 1992 service industry accounted for 4% of GDP, whereas IT industry had high percentage (precisely 6% ). In the next two years, both components contributed in GDP with 6 to 8%. Moreover, there was less difference in the percentage of both industries in 1996, but IT industry still had more percentage than service industry.
In addition, over the following two years the patterns of the two components were significantly changed. The percentage of GDP from IT industry increased sharply up to 12% , while service industry was about 8% . At the end of the period, the percentage of IT industry was almost twice that of service industry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ervice industry accounted for 4% of GDP, whereas IT industry had high percentage ...
^^
Line 9, column 119, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ndustry had high percentage precisely 6% . In the next two years, both components ...
^^
Line 13, column 172, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... IT industry increased sharply up to 12% , while service industry was about 8% . A...
^^
Line 13, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...2% , while service industry was about 8% . At the end of the period, the percentag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, still, whereas, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05660377358 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83327281465 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5374146254 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161408956634 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799197426508 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538508130749 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107253153517 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230313793195 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.