The chart shows the end of year value for four major international money market indices from 2002 to 2008. [Dow Jones = US Market Index, DAX 30 = German Market Index, CAC 40 = French Market Index, KOSPI = Korean Market Index]
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates, the information of major money market indices of four countries namely US (Dowo jones), German (DAX 30), French (CAC), Korean (KOSPI) at the end of the year between 2002 and 2008.
Overall, it has been clear from the chart that, Dow jones was the highest position in money exchange index value among the given countries in all the years. While, in comparison, the lowest account holder was Korean money index throughout the period given. However, the other two countries has a moderate growth in money index value except the final year.
Like every given year, US money market was at the top with more than 8000 units in 2002 as well. Whilst, at the next three years, the end of year index value increased to above 10000 units. Although, the significant growth in money market index value of Dow jones was in the year of 2006 and 2007 which is approximately over 12000 units. However, index value of Dow jones declined to just above 8000 units by 2008. Meanwhile, in KOSPI Korean money market have only about 1000 at the beginning of the period and continue the same all the given years with mild fluctuations. As is observed, in 2007, a slight progression of KOSPI in the field of money exchange indices with near 1000 units.
Regarding, DAX 30 accounts for the second position in money market indices. Such as, in 2002, the index value was around 3000 units which is escalated to 4000 in the following two years. After the gradual progress index value reached at the peak point in 2007 with 8000 units before falling down to about 5000 units in 2008. Similarly, CAC also had some reasonable surge in the end of year index value such as in 2002, the index was at about 3000 units, which is hiked up in the consecutive years and relatively highest position in 2006 and 2007 with near 6000 units. While, the account was declined to approximately 3000 units by 2008.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion in money exchange index value among the given countries in all the years. Wh...
^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in all the years. While, in comparison, the lowest account holder was Korean mon...
^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l. Whilst, at the next three years, the end of year index value increased to ab...
^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he end of year index value increased to above 10000 units. Although, the signifi...
^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ust above 8000 units by 2008. Meanwhile, in KOSPI Korean money market have only a...
^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ted to 4000 in the following two years. After the gradual progress index value reache...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 502, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'relatively the highest'.
Suggestion: relatively the highest
...s hiked up in the consecutive years and relatively highest position in 2006 and 2007 with near 600...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 569, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in 2006 and 2007 with near 6000 units. While, the account was declined to approximat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, second, similarly, so, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 33.7804878049 198% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 965.302439024 162% => OK
No of words: 334.0 196.424390244 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66766467066 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26645915565 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461077844311 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 283.868780488 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1797508354 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.933333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435784629511 0.215688989381 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158890001815 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845945110852 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295538337173 0.15604864568 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661720763854 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.