The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The given bar chart illustrates the regularity of Americans consuming fast food during the period of 2003 to 2013.
It is evident that the majority of American citizens visited fast food restaurants with the frequency of once a week and several times a month, with the latter experiencing upward trend in 2013. The year of 2013 also witnessed a slight decrease in the common visits of fast food consumers compared to the previous time stamp.
As can be seen from the graph, around one fourth to one third of the American population enjoyed their meals at fast food chains with the regularity of once a week \to twice a month. Starting at 30% in 2003, the figure for weekly visits rose slightly in 2006 by 3% before dropping significantly to around 27% seven years later. The rise for this category was at odds with the drop for monthly customers, since the number of fast food consumers decreased by 5% in 2006 and then rocketed to more than 33% at the end of the period.
Looking at the bar chart in more detail, there was an noticeable divergence in the remaining Americans’visit rates to the fast food establishments/ eateries. While the number of consumers who enjoyed fast food few times a year remained static, that of weekly customers plummeted by 5% in the period of 2006 to 2013. Similarly, those two timestamps witnessed a drop of daily consumers in contrast to the increase of new fast food eaters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood during the period of 2003 to 2013. It is evident that the majority of Ameri...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s compared to the previous time stamp. As can be seen from the graph, around on...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore than 33% at the end of the period. Looking at the bar chart in more detail,...
^^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...the bar chart in more detail, there was an noticeable divergence in the remaining ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, similarly, so, then, third, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77327935223 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76484725389 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546558704453 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.763678254 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4444444444 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205072557805 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104104085294 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578075039226 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160221908367 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590463608272 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.