The given chart gives information about the frequency of eating at junk food restaurants in the USA from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, most of the Americans had a meal once a week in 2003 and 2006. However, the highest frequency of consuming fast-food belongs to one or twice in a month in 2013.
At first, in 2003, whereas having instant food every week had the most proportion (approximately 32%), that of every day and never junk food were the least with 4% and 5% respectively. Next, the frequency of consuming instant food for one time a week reached its maximum percentage to 35% in 2006 which was followed by a downward trend in 2013. In the same manner, several times a week figure started at about 17% and then peaked at 20% in 2006 and experience a fall in 2013. Both the proportion of every day and never eating decreased by approximately 1% in 2006 and then did not change over the following next 7 years.
Moreover, having junk food once or twice a week stood at vicinity of 30% in 2003 after which it reduced by 5% in 2006. After this, it made the most frequency at 33% in 2013. Similarly, a few time a year had an upward trend between 2003 and 2006. It saw a small rise in 2006 and it remained static in 2013.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 187, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
... frequency at 33% in 2013. Similarly, a few time a year had an upward trend between 2003...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, similarly, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37719298246 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46731480592 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504385964912 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.690121042 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7272727273 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196592733009 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847936104388 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700294847558 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157332014838 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724288207254 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.