The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013

The bar chart provides information regarding the frequency of having meal in fast food restaurants among the USA people in three different years (2003, 2006, 2013).

At first, the bars have approximately a normal distribution, and also some similar patterns in related years. For example, in three groups of data sets (every day, once or twice a month, never) eating fast food decreased in the year 2006 in contrast with the 2003, and two of them ( never, every day) leveled of after seven years (in 2013) and other one (once or twice a week) climbed considerably. By contrast, in other groups of data ( several times a week, once a week, a few times a year) the patterns reversed, meaning it rose from the year 2003 to 2006 and then decreased or stayed at the same level in 2013.

The second, we can select three different patterns for data. The first one is: once or twice a month with once a week, second: several times a week and a few times a year and the last one: every day and never. As figure shows, the first frequency group was the most popular ones among clients in three different years and the figures of people fluctuated between 25% to 32.5%. Also, the second class marks were between 12.5% to 20%, and for the last groups the proportions were between 3% to 5% with lowest popularity ni terms of frequency.

To conclude, it seems that in some groups of data, there were a periodic upward-downward or vice versa trend among people, and sometimes it experienced no noticeable change.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...year 2006 in contrast with the 2003, and two of them never, every day leveled o...
^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...contrast with the 2003, and two of them never, every day leveled of after seven...
^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2003, and two of them never, every day leveled of after seven years in 2013 an...
^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay leveled of after seven years in 2013 and other one once or twice a week climb...
^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly. By contrast, in other groups of data several times a week, once a week, a few...
^^
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the year 2003 to 2006 and then decreased or stayed at the same level in 2013. ...
^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
... a year and the last one: every day and never. As figure shows, the first frequency g...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the lowest'.
Suggestion: with the lowest
...s the proportions were between 3% to 5% with lowest popularity ni terms of frequency. To...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, then, for example, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64150943396 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48479606068 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539622641509 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5449073177 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.666666667 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4444444444 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146811219417 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667119548 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100587863173 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11800053403 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129212386517 0.0819641961636 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.