The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport
The figures summarizes information about amounts of goods that had been conveyed by four modes of transportation systems; road, water, rail and pipeline in the UK during a period of 29 years from the years 1974 to 2002.
Using roads, water, and pipeline, all had approximately an increasing trend for transporting goods but rail systems after making some decreasing fluctuations had reached to a consistent amount loading goods in the year 2002 as well as the year 1940.
Pipeline systems had the minimum usage during these 29 years, and roads conserved their first places from the year 1974 to 2002. However, from the year 1974 to 1978 rail systems were used more than water for transporting goods but water systems after an overtaking in the 1978 grasped the second position.
Water and pipeline systems, had the least usage in the year 1974. Furthermore, they experienced their maximum usage in the year 2002, and also for pipeline systems this issue had begun from the year 1994 and it preserved the same amount until the end of duration. Meanwhile, the highest consumption of roads was in the year 1982 and the lowest was in the year 2002. Also, the water systems had the same patterns in terms of minimum and maximum usage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'summarize'.
Suggestion: summarize
The figures summarizes information about amounts of goods that...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, second, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92857142857 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51643576902 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1148506692 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.375 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155969329558 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799954428285 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730247981173 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130542866345 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737827885632 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.