Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Improving fundamental infrastructures of integrated roads are becoming highly controversial nowadays. I personally, feel that to say money spending should be on railroads rather than roads is not justified, and I will explain why in this essay.
Firstly, thanks to modern technology, using private vehicles and also public transportation systems especially in crowded cities seems to be dramatically high. Meaning that, in order to reduce bottlenecks, authorities have to improve the quality of both roads and railways to help decreasing congestion in inner part of the cities. Secondly, of course, countryside dwellers and people living in hinterlands find traveling by public transportation more affordable, but lack of enough trains causes less frequent schedules which leads messy wagons in peak hours, then they decide to go to their workplaces by commute car pooling instead. Therefore, dedicating budgets for roads are also necessary.
Admittedly, I do understand the views about considering much more budgets for railways rather than roads. Because, people may think that using trains is more cheaper than private cars. Nevertheless, not all people have to travel by trains. For example people who live in small cities do not need traveling long distances to get to their workplaces, and using personal cars can be affordable because of the low consumption of fuel in short distances for citizens.
Overall, I believe that improving standards of integrated roads and railways both should be considered, because high population need to have different choices to get to their destinations more conveniently and without tolerating long distance exhaustion for the only reason of congestion specially in conurbations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to decrease' or 'decrease'.
Suggestion: to decrease; decrease
...lity of both roads and railways to help decreasing congestion in inner part of the cities....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...budgets for railways rather than roads. Because, people may think that using trains is ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cheaper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cheaper
..., people may think that using trains is more cheaper than private cars. Nevertheless, not al...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in short, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62213740458 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09180331083 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629770992366 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.7997600637 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.909090909 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1553352184 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630111735796 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750651962294 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106542514771 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727116810072 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.