The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000.
Given is the bar chart depicting how much salt people in the US consumed in 2000.
By and large, women ate less salt than men did in all age brackets, beside, only individuals in the youngest group absorbed salt lower than the average intake suggested for adults
As can be seen, boys who were under 6 years old ate 2,250 milligram salt, equal to a half of salt that men from 20 to 39 years old had. Simultaneously, there were 1,300 milligram salt in the diet of under 6-year old girls while that of the 20 to 39 ones were 3,000 milligram every day.
Regarding the other sex, it is recorded that the amount of salt in the meals of men in other age ranges fluctuated between 3500 and 4300 while females, whose ages were from 6 to 60 shared the same proportion of salt that they had on a daily basis, 3000 milligram. In addition, the capacity of the mentioned ingredient per day advised was 2,500 milligram, referencing this recommendation was followed by over 60-year old women.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'milligram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'milligrams'.
Suggestion: milligrams
...lt that they had on a daily basis, 3000 milligram. In addition, the capacity of the menti...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, while, in addition, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51123595506 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49989900061 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651685393258 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.2173378824 43.030603864 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.6 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.6 22.9334400587 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16454649191 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993827088159 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960893438032 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124378394969 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089872908014 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.