The chart shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.
The chart depicts the number of British male and female undergraduates working part-time and studying full-time in tertiary education in connection with three distinctive time periods.
Overall, students of both genders were in favor of working part-time rather than pursuing full-time education. In addition, the trend of men having part-time education is a fluctuation while that of women was an overall increase.
As per the chart, the prevalence of men working part-time was the highest in the time period of 1970-1971 with the figure crossing one-million mark, whereas that of their female counterparts was in 1990-1991 with 100-thousand students more than the former. When considering the period of 1980-1981, the ubiquity of part-time education seen in both genders was somewhere in the vicinity of 850 thousand. However, in the next ten years, the figure of male students working part-time jobs only witnessed a slight increase when comparing with the exponential increase seen in that of women.
In regards to full-time education, the number of men pursuing this type of education saw a gradual increase over the time period. In comparison with men, the trend of women doubled, from merely 100 thousand to 200 thousand students. In 1990-1991, this growth in terms of females not having a side job slowed down with apparently only 210 thousand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...tial increase seen in that of women. In regards to full-time education, the number of men ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...adual increase over the time period. In comparison with men, the trend of women doubled, f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... 100 thousand to 200 thousand students. In 1990-1991, this growth in terms of fema...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34418604651 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83766675687 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3309858573 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396446044668 0.215688989381 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185000632122 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11615531647 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283025979912 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790957507003 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.